Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Failure by design

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Failure by design

    There are all kinds of examples of this from cheap appliances to hot house flowers, but sometimes it can be useful.

    For my example I point to Diet Coke, which I'd freebase if I could. I usually buy it in 2-liter bottles and keep them on their side in the fridge. Diet Coke starts to degrade when it is depressurized and exposed to oxygen. Which is why I store them on their side. I can't do anything about the oxygen, but I can preserve the pressure as long as possible.

    So I have it in a vacuum thermal coffee mug from Starbuck's which I store in the refrigerator. When I first crack into a bottle and pour it into the container, it bubbles up to the point I'm waiting 5 minutes to fill the stupid thing. But one morning I pulled the container from the fridge and it still had diet coke in it, though very flat. So I dumped it into the sink but I didn't rinse it because I wanted to preserve the internal temperature.

    When I poured the diet coke in, the foaming was nowhere near as slow or inflated. Took under a minute to fill. I tried it again hours later with the same result.

    After dumping old diet coke from the container all that's left is what's stuck to the sides. With such a small amount of whatever oxidized chemical on the walls, the fact it has such a profound reaction with a new bottle of diet coke (reducing foaming without depleting the carbonation) leads me to think it's a catalytic reaction. But what kind of free flowing catalyzing chemical could they be using? And how do they make it self-destruct into a nasty, flat fluid?

    I know why, of course, to sell more Coke.

    #2
    Originally posted by WritersPanic View Post
    There are all kinds of examples of this from cheap appliances to hot house flowers, but sometimes it can be useful.

    For my example I point to Diet Coke, which I'd freebase if I could. I usually buy it in 2-liter bottles and keep them on their side in the fridge. Diet Coke starts to degrade when it is depressurized and exposed to oxygen. Which is why I store them on their side. I can't do anything about the oxygen, but I can preserve the pressure as long as possible.

    So I have it in a vacuum thermal coffee mug from Starbuck's which I store in the refrigerator. When I first crack into a bottle and pour it into the container, it bubbles up to the point I'm waiting 5 minutes to fill the stupid thing. But one morning I pulled the container from the fridge and it still had diet coke in it, though very flat. So I dumped it into the sink but I didn't rinse it because I wanted to preserve the internal temperature.

    When I poured the diet coke in, the foaming was nowhere near as slow or inflated. Took under a minute to fill. I tried it again hours later with the same result.

    After dumping old diet coke from the container all that's left is what's stuck to the sides. With such a small amount of whatever oxidized chemical on the walls, the fact it has such a profound reaction with a new bottle of diet coke (reducing foaming without depleting the carbonation) leads me to think it's a catalytic reaction. But what kind of free flowing catalyzing chemical could they be using? And how do they make it self-destruct into a nasty, flat fluid?

    I know why, of course, to sell more Coke.
    hi WritersPanic your post is super meticulously written!✍

    Comment


      #3
      Look at the ingredients.

      Comment


        #4
        I found another one, Blistex medicated lip balm. Chemically I find no fault, it's a good product that seems to last a long time in a backpack.

        BUT, it has a flaw...

        This one is "empty".
        Click image for larger version

Name:	Blistex.png
Views:	35
Size:	264.9 KB
ID:	239480
        The package says it has a net weight of 4.25 grams. But the mechanism for delivery sacrifices
        somewhere between 10% and 20% of the product unless you're desperate enough to go digging.

        Why do it this way? It guarantees needless waste. Welllll, if you lose 20% each time you buy it
        you're going to need more of it sooner than if they had designed it properly.

        Comment


        #5
        So here's another failure, The "David Bowie" edition Barbie Doll!!!!

        Sorry, but the story is on Fox News. I realize that causes panic, loathing and distress, but push through it.

        Mattel has released a second David Bowie doll on Wednesday. The newest doll is dressed in a replica of Bowie’s powder-blue suit from his “Life on Mars?” music video.


        Click image for larger version

Name:	David-Bowie-Barbie-1-Mattel.jpg?ve=1&tl=1.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	11.4 KB
ID:	239490

        I sure don't recall Bowie having a bust line.

        Click image for larger version

Name:	David-Bowie-Barbie-2-Mattel.jpg?ve=1&tl=1.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	26.3 KB
ID:	239491

        And Bowie's eyes were different colors. He had razor thin lips and kinda needed braces.

        This is just Mattel looking to score a buck from stupid collectors. I mean geeez, look at that round face.
        Even the wig is wrong, though close in color.


        Attached Files

        Comment


        • GLEN......
          GLEN...... commented
          Editing a comment
          Thanks For Posting That "WP".....I Just Cancelled My Order....

          Cheers Glen.
      Working...
      X