... may I remove the condom now?
A bill soon to be tabled in Californicate would amend the state definition of sexual battery to include a person "who causes contact between a penis, from which a condom has been removed, and the intimate part of another who did not verbally consent to the condom being removed.
"The bill, AB 453, would add a provision that says a person commits sexual battery if they cause “contact between a penis, from which a condom has been removed, and the intimate part of another who did not verbally consent to the condom being removed.”
Said bill will be introduced by one Sylvia R. Garcia who, from what I've seen of her, is highly unlikely to be confronted by any type of "sexual battery."
Its a strange, strange world we live in Master Jack!
A bill soon to be tabled in Californicate would amend the state definition of sexual battery to include a person "who causes contact between a penis, from which a condom has been removed, and the intimate part of another who did not verbally consent to the condom being removed.
"The bill, AB 453, would add a provision that says a person commits sexual battery if they cause “contact between a penis, from which a condom has been removed, and the intimate part of another who did not verbally consent to the condom being removed.”
Said bill will be introduced by one Sylvia R. Garcia who, from what I've seen of her, is highly unlikely to be confronted by any type of "sexual battery."
Its a strange, strange world we live in Master Jack!
Comment