The stress of jail time and the threat of deportation has not aged him very well, he looks like Santa now!
-
-
David Letterman isnt looking so good. -
Can anyone remember what that was all about anyway, without googling that is
Like the biggest "leak", besides Hillary's emails was about troops doing something in Afghanistan, hitting a bunch of civilians or something, which Biden just flat out did and the US admitted recently anyway
And that was back when Obama was in office, So Obama did it, Biden did it now also
Trump didn't
Hmmmm
Comment
-
You got anything else than to mention his appearance and how his forced isolation took a toll on him?Originally posted by Micko View PostThe stress of jail time and the threat of deportation has not aged him very well, he looks like Santa now!
Comment
-
It doesn't. Just a bit disappointed i guess there's another Assange thread that's just superficial drivel -
Uhm yeah, not sure what that has to do with anything. My point still stands..
Micko
-
-
I recall a lot, but would google to formulate the relevance and importance of his actions well and adequately.Originally posted by Vanilla Gorilla View Post
Partly because I have not been following this case recently at all, and so its very understandable one doesn't readily remember it all, and also to find the right words and terms in order to be sure i formulate it clear.
If i haven't heard of it in like 2 years i tend to conflate this person and his actions with Edward Snowden
There's absolutely no shame or some issue in googling him again to make sure you know what it was all about before joining a thread like this. People who wanna act like it is just try to stop people from doing so or make them feel guilty/ashamed for feeling the need to. Dubious convo tacticComment
-
Heres an idea, how about you do the work for once. Instead of bitching and just using the opportunity to put down another memberOriginally posted by Din Djarin View Post
I recall a lot, but would google to formulate the relevance and importance of his actions well and adequately.
Partly because I have not been following this case recently at all, and so its very understandable one doesn't readily remember it all, and also to find the right words and terms in order to be sure i formulate it clear.
If i haven't heard of it in like 2 years i tend to conflate this person and his actions with Edward Snowden
There's absolutely no shame or some issue in googling him again to make sure you know what it was all about before joining a thread like this. People who wanna act like it is just try to stop people from doing so or make them feel guilty/ashamed for feeling the need to. Dubious convo tactic
Aside from Hillary's emails, what was the most damning leak from Wikileaks?
I can remember a grainy video of civilians getting killed, can't remember if they were near soldiers and someone missed or someone mistook them for soldiers. Can't even remember if it was Iraq or Afghanistan. I remember it being a pretty lame leak, and it was while a libtard President was in charge of the US so no one really cared
Comment
-
I'm not putting down another member? And not asking or trying to trigger another member to do the work for me...
I was merely saying how theres nothing bad about googling it first, which is what YOU were implying.
Keep clowning -
If I'm putting down another member here because im snappy and critical in a way you are ALL the time, that would make you a ridiculous hypocrite nagging on that...
But i think its safe to assume this OP is nothing more than an attempt to superficially circle jerk on Assange, which suits you. Hence it doesn't suit you if someone would make an informed counter post (if necessary by checking up on details by googling again first). Nice try, or....
-
-
I thought he was the flounder of Wikipedia.Comment
-
Civilian casualties actually increased under Trump because the rules of engagement were relaxed under his administration. The media was just too focused on the stupid shit he was saying on Twitter so stuff like this went under the radarOriginally posted by Vanilla Gorilla View Post
https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/...kesAfghanistan
And the video of the civilians being gunned down happened in 2007 under Bush, but was released when Obama was president.
It's just that the people who were explaining this away as "the cost of war" under Bush and Trump suddenly care under Biden for some reason. From my link, civilian casualties increased 330% under Trump, but that doesn't matter when there is fake outrage to be had over one, highly publicized incident of civilian casualties under Biden's watch, amirite?
Not being partisan though, civilian casualties happened under Obama as well. American foreign policy seems pretty standard no matter who the president is. Which is why it's infuriating to me to see the same people who had like 20 American flags decorating their lawn during the Bush years pretending to be anti war all of a sudden. Same goes for Democrats who suddenly seem(ed) oddly pro war under Obama and Biden, and who jumped on the pro-Bush bandwagon the last 4 years just because Bush has a better personality than Trump.
Tribalism, eh?
but I digressLast edited by Meliai; 09-29-2021, 01:11 PM.Comment
-
Was Iraq
The event itself, disgusting, especially the part where they shoot two guys obviously just trying to pick up a wounded guy
As a "leak" though, it was pretty lame. A murder via Apache the same as a muder via a missile strike, and it's not like anyone didn't know there were lots of them going on
Comment
Comment