I recently watched a video titled "MIT Has Predicted that Society Will Collapse in 2040". The video makes reference to a 1972 study made by MIT-affiliated researchers titled "The Limits to Growth":
The original 1972 study does not predict a societal collapse in 2040 specifically, however. It's rather an updated version of the study conducted by another researcher that reaches that conclusion. The video also suggests that the study's conclusions were confirmed by KPMG, whereas the excerpt below from the wikipedia article indicates that it was rather a study made by a lead analyst at KPMG, but in a personal capacity.
It's not clear how much of the "rather sudden and uncontrollable decline in [...] population" predicted in the original report would come from decreased birth rates, and how much would come from increased mortality, though mass-scale starvation seems plausible in the worst-case scenario.
The original 1972 study does not predict a societal collapse in 2040 specifically, however. It's rather an updated version of the study conducted by another researcher that reaches that conclusion. The video also suggests that the study's conclusions were confirmed by KPMG, whereas the excerpt below from the wikipedia article indicates that it was rather a study made by a lead analyst at KPMG, but in a personal capacity.
In 2020, an analysis by Gaya Herrington (Sustainability and Dynamic System Analysis Lead at KPMG in the United States but in a personal capacity) was published in Yale's Journal of Industrial Ecology.[50] The study assessed whether, given key data known in 2020 about factors important for the "Limits to Growth" report, the original report's conclusions are supported. In particular, the 2020 study examined updated quantitative information about ten factors, namely population, fertility rates, mortality rates, industrial output, food production, services, non-renewable resources, persistent pollution, human welfare, and ecological footprint, and concluded that the "Limits to Growth" prediction is essentially correct in that continued economic growth is unsustainable under a "business as usual" model.[50] The study found that current empirical data is broadly consistent with the 1972 projections, and that if major changes to the consumption of resources are not undertaken, economic growth will peak and then rapidly decline by around 2040.[51][52]
Comment