It occurs to me that if there was some sort of agreement between the 12 or so wealthiest, most singularly powerful each of the human kind, how might they put that plan in motion?
To pull this off on a global scale will take a substantial amount of time overall. There must be a leading plan to sort the myriad variables.
For example:
Which populations of humans do you want to reduce? Even the most efficient method of scaling toes a tight line with the kind of brutal selection processes established by Nazis. The really insidious part is that ultimately it was a ruse to maintain compliance. All of them were to be killed.
Fast forward to today. In a more finite example, we happen to have a very handy disease floating about. What's weird about it is that it has become a political issue in all kinds of bizarre ways. The only words you can trust are those from printed matter that's a couple of decades old regarding infection control.
So look how they have suddenly angered two sides who don't know anything about this. They are telling the people who are to be spared, to stay out of the churches and stay home. Unless you're a Muslim. However, if you want to attend a mass protest with violent rioting, atomized bodily droplets all over the place, masks only used as disguises, "free love" etc, that's just fine. Think about that. In 1980s terms that would be setting everyone up for sickness and death.
Using a disease, via propaganda, to kill off a segment of the population that is prone to the most kinetic and aggressive tactics.
Who remains? The docile, who follow orders and avoid making waves.
To pull this off on a global scale will take a substantial amount of time overall. There must be a leading plan to sort the myriad variables.
For example:
Which populations of humans do you want to reduce? Even the most efficient method of scaling toes a tight line with the kind of brutal selection processes established by Nazis. The really insidious part is that ultimately it was a ruse to maintain compliance. All of them were to be killed.
Fast forward to today. In a more finite example, we happen to have a very handy disease floating about. What's weird about it is that it has become a political issue in all kinds of bizarre ways. The only words you can trust are those from printed matter that's a couple of decades old regarding infection control.
So look how they have suddenly angered two sides who don't know anything about this. They are telling the people who are to be spared, to stay out of the churches and stay home. Unless you're a Muslim. However, if you want to attend a mass protest with violent rioting, atomized bodily droplets all over the place, masks only used as disguises, "free love" etc, that's just fine. Think about that. In 1980s terms that would be setting everyone up for sickness and death.
Using a disease, via propaganda, to kill off a segment of the population that is prone to the most kinetic and aggressive tactics.
Who remains? The docile, who follow orders and avoid making waves.
Comment