I know this has been brought into the grade school classes across the USA and Canada for years. Many have denied it is a problem or even happening. It has been a slow burn for many years.
California recently had a training session for its teachers.
“It states that facts, data, and the scientific method are ‘white concepts’. So, if you use facts and data to disprove an argument against a black person or an oppressed person, you are proving you are racist because, again, facts and data are, quote, the result of whiteness.”
”The White power structure will support people of color when it is in their interest as well.”
The origins of property rights in the United States are rooted in racial domination. The law has played a considerable role in transforming the abstract concept of race into something people believe is real and tangible. As a result, "whiteness" can be considered a property interest. This tenet asks us to consider property as including more than just "tangible things:"
What is your take on it?
California recently had a training session for its teachers.
“It states that facts, data, and the scientific method are ‘white concepts’. So, if you use facts and data to disprove an argument against a black person or an oppressed person, you are proving you are racist because, again, facts and data are, quote, the result of whiteness.”
”The White power structure will support people of color when it is in their interest as well.”
The origins of property rights in the United States are rooted in racial domination. The law has played a considerable role in transforming the abstract concept of race into something people believe is real and tangible. As a result, "whiteness" can be considered a property interest. This tenet asks us to consider property as including more than just "tangible things:"
What is your take on it?
Comment